Search Results for "Promotional increment"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Denial of Promotion Based on Uncommunicated Adverse Remarks — Violation of Natural Justice. Non-communication of adverse entries in ACR renders them void and cannot be used to deny promotion under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, F H Shaikh, joined service on 10/05/1982 as a Class-II officer (Principal) under the Director of Employment and Training, Gujarat Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.

The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Sealed Cover Promotion Case — Prosecution for Criminal Charge Must Be Pending Before Court to Invoke Sealed Cover Procedure. OM dated 14.09.1992 Clause (iii) Requires Actual Pendency of Criminal Prosecution, Not Mere Investigation or Sanction.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which upheld the order of the Central Administrative Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows ICAR Appeal in Service Benefit Dispute — Scientists and Technical Staff Not Similarly Situated for Advance Increments on Acquiring Ph.D. Article 14 Does Not Mandate Equal Treatment Across Distinct Cadres Governed by Different Rules.

The case involves a dispute between the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and its technical staff (respondents) regarding entitlement to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Pay Anomaly Case - Stepping Up of Pay Not Permissible Under FR 22 When Junior's Higher Pay Is Due to ACP Scheme, Not Promotion. The Court held that FR 22 does not apply when the junior's higher pay is due to ACP upgradation, which is not a promotion.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against a judgment of the Karnataka High Court, which had allowed writ petitions filed by two employ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Post-Retirement Re-Fixation of Pay Without Notice. Re-fixation of pay after retirement without affording opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Naeem Ahmedkhan s/o Dilawarkhan, a retired government servant, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Vocational Instructors in Maharashtra. Termination of Shikshan Sevaks (Vocational Instructors) prior to completion of three-year probation period held illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by vocational instructors (Shikshan Sevaks) challenging their termination from service by the Shri Shi...