Search Results for "Mumbai Port Trust"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Port Trust Against Sub-Tenant — Eviction Order Restored Under Public Premises Act. Sub-tenant cannot claim protection under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act as premises are governed by the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (a statutory corporation), filed a writ petition challenging an order of the City Civil Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Appointment of Vice Chancellor of University of Mumbai. Court upholds appointment process under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, finding no illegality or mala fides.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as the Vice Chanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Broker to Operate Pending Enquiry in Suspension Case. Suspension order set aside for violation of natural justice as no hearing was given and no urgency reasons recorded under Regulation 20 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013.

The petitioner, GAC Shipping (India) Pvt. Ltd., a customs house broker licensed under the Customs Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 (renewed under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Structure on Open Space. Notice Under Section 55 of MRTP Act, 1966 Upheld as Structure Was Built Without Permission on Municipal Land.

The appellants, legal heirs of late Jyotiswarup Valmiki, filed an appeal against the judgment and decree of the City Civil Court, Bombay, dismissing t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Bank Guarantee Invocation Dispute. Fraud Must Be Established at Invocation Stage; Bank Guarantee Is Independent Contract Between Bank and Beneficiary.

The appellant, M/s. ABG Ports Limited, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the Joint Bid Agreement (JBA), the Counter Guarantee, and its invocatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Representation by Advocate as Officer of Employers' Association Under Section 36 of Industrial Disputes Act. Advocate-Officer Can Represent Employer Without Leave of Court as Capacity as Officer Is Distinct from That of Advocate.

The petitioner, Atul Pande, filed a writ petition challenging an interlocutory order dated 3 March 2012 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court,...