Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Rules 1989"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Rules 1989"

319 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Holds Owner and Insurer Vicariously Liable for Driver's Negligence Despite Breach of Instructions. The court ruled that carrying excess passengers does not absolve the owner of vicarious liability when the driver was acting in the course of employment under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Jan 2019

This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was filed by the claimants, Malanbai and Vanita, challenging the judgment of the Claims...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSRTC Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Compensation Awards Upheld as Just and Proper. Claimant Bellappa awarded Rs.3,20,800 and Rs.13,444 for injuries sustained in two separate accidents involving KSRTC buses; court finds no grounds for interference under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

28 Sep 2016

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) filed three appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgm...

High Court

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

10 Mar 2025

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cancellation of Vehicle Registration in Customs Duty Evasion Case — Petitioner Not a Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice. Registration Cancellation Under Section 55(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Upheld as Vehicle Was Fraudulently Imported Availing Customs Duty Exemption for Diplomatic Officer.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Imran Humayun Chandiwala, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9 September ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 and Invalidates Delegation of Permit-Granting Power to Secretary. The State Legislature has plenary power to repeal a state Act under the Concurrent List without fresh Presidential assent, and the quasi-judicial function of granting permits under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 cannot be delegated to the Secretary of the Transport Authority.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of civil appeals arising from a common judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated 28 March 2011. The ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Strict Enforcement of Helmet Law in Public Interest Litigation. Court Emphasizes Compliance with Section 129 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to Reduce Road Fatalities.

3 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Free Legal Aid Cell (NGO), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeking directions for strict enforcement o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Driving License in Motor Vehicle Act Case — Lack of Notice and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. License Suspension Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Provide Show Cause Notice Before Suspension Under Section 19(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

5 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Neelappagouda S/o Virupaxgouda Patil, was a driver employed with KSRTC. On 25.08.2014, while driving a bus bearing No.KA-19F/2461 on N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Owner's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Evidence on Driving Licence Violation. The court held that the owner failed to prove breach of policy conditions regarding driving licence, and thus the owner is liable to pay compensation under Section 149(2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

17 Jun 2019

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Smt. Channawwa, was injured in a road accident involving a goods lorr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to MSRTC Circular Requiring Heavy Vehicle Driving License for Driver-cum-Conductor Posts. Court Holds That Prescribing Higher Qualification for Driving Heavy Passenger Vehicles Is a Reasonable Condition Based on Public Safety and Operational Necessity, Not Arbitrary.

4 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Maharashtra S. T. Workers Congress (INTUC), a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Driver's Invalid License, with Right to Recover from Owner. Third-party liability upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, applying 'pay and recover' principle.

2 Apr 2014

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Babulal Somani and Rukhamanibai, parents of the deceased, who died in a vehicular accident involv...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)