Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 166"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 166"

1016 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1016 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Sep 2017

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

9 Dec 2022

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Civil Court Jurisdiction Upheld for Owner's Claim for Damages to Vehicle. The Court held that a suit for damages to the insured vehicle filed by the owner against the insurer is maintainable before a Civil Court and not barred by Section 175 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

3 Oct 2023

The case involves a second appeal filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court, which confir...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Not Liable to Pay Compensation as Claimant Was a Gratuitous Passenger on a Goods Vehicle. The court held that the insurer is not liable to indemnify the owner of a goods vehicle when the injured person was traveling as a gratuitous passenger, as the policy does not cover such risk.

28 Mar 2016

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Shimoga...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Decides Appeals Against MACT Award in Motor Accident Claims. Parties Dispute Compensation Amount and Liability of Insurers Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

28 Mar 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals Against Section 163A Awards — Claim Petitions Under Section 163A Are Maintainable Even If Negligence Is Not Proved. The court held that Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides a no-fault liability scheme, and therefore, claim petitions under this section are maintainable without proof of negligence.

30 Nov 2018

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, disposed of two appeals filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited challenging the awards pass...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Claimant's Residence Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. MACT Aurangabad had jurisdiction as claimant resided within its territorial limits, despite accident occurring elsewhere.

6 Dec 2022

The appellant, Navnath s/o Shripati Bhawar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Insurance Company's Liability to Pay Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Despite Invalid Driving License — Pay and Recover Principle Applied. Insurance Company Directed to Pay Award Amount to Claimants and Recover from Owner for Breach of Policy Conditions Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

21 Jun 2019

The appeal was filed by National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 27/10/2014 of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Pune, in M.A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Condonation of Delay in Section 140 Motor Accident Claim — No Limitation Prescribed for No-Fault Compensation. Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Application for Condonation of Delay as Section 140 Does Not Prescribe Any Limitation Period.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Ramesh Bhimrao Patil, was injured in a motor accident that occurred on 24 November 1989. He filed an application under Section 166 of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's Review Order and Restores Compensation Award; Holds Tribunal Has No Power of Review Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Due to Absence of Specific Review Provision.

8 Oct 2020

The petitioners, parents of the deceased Hanumaiah, filed MVC No.1010/1998 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madhugiri under Section 166 of t...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)