Search Results for "Money lending"

493 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 493 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Finding of Money Lending Transaction and Time Bar. Agreement to sell held to be a loan transaction; suit for specific performance barred by limitation as no time fixed for performance.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell. The defendant/respondent contended that the transaction was a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka disposes writ petitions filed by home loan borrowers seeking restraint and no due certificate; court issues directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by individual home loan borrowers against the Union of India, Ministry of Finance, R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Money Suit Due to Perverse Findings on Loan Repayment. Concurrent findings of fact set aside as courts below ignored material evidence regarding repayment of loan under Section 34 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The appellant/defendant, Madhukar alias Babanrao Ganpat Sabnis, a landlord, appealed against the concurrent decrees in a money suit filed by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Sections 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With in Revision.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, S. Mohammed, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...