Search Results for "Meeting Rules, 1959"

457 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 457 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Violation of Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Motion Held Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Smt. Kalimun Balaso Nadaf, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Udgaon. Respondent Nos. 3 to 11 submitted resignations from the post of m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Delegate Nomination Dispute for KMF President Election. Exclusion from Voter List and Commissioner’s Intervention Challenged Under Section 21(2) and Section 28-A(4-B) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act.

The case involved a dispute concerning the right of a delegate to vote in the election for the President of the Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF), an ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificates — Holds That Disqualification Under Section 10(1A) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Requires Prior Opportunity of Hearing and Cannot Be Automatic.

The petitioners, three women elected as Sarpanch and Members of Gram Panchayat Kshetra Mahuli, challenged an order dated 11th February 2025 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Insufficient Notice Period. Notice Period of 15 Days Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Must Exclude Date of Notice and Date of Meeting.

The petitioner, Shaikh Jadanbee Shaikh Rais, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Garkheda-Jomala, Taluka Bhokardan, District Jalna. Respondent No.5, Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Dual Proceedings on Cooperative Housing Society Dispute Over Change of User and Structural Alterations. The Court Examines Legality of Converting Residential Flats to Nursing Home and Making Additions Without Consent Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The matter involved two consolidated proceedings: a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes District Collector's Order Setting Aside No Confidence Motion Against Upsarpanch. No Confidence Motion Valid Despite Discrepancy in Reasons, as Expression of Want of Confidence Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion moved against the Upsarpanch of Group Grampanchayat, Adkhal, Taluka Dapoli, District Ratnagiri. The Gram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification from Co-operative Society Election. Legal Representative Admitted After Death Fails to Meet One-Year Membership Requirement Under Section 20(2)(a-iii) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Smt. Chinnammayya, was the wife of a deceased member of Begihalli Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Ltd. Her husband, Ramaiah, die...