Search Results for "Master Service Agreements"

155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Erstwhile Directors in First Insolvency Case, Holding IBC Overrides State Moratorium. Corporate Debtor's Belated Defence of Non-Disbursal Under Master Restructuring Agreement Rejected as After-Thought.

The case arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, a multi-product company, faced ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival Claims Over Control of Church Assets and Applicability of 1934 Constitution Pending Adjudication.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from judgments and decrees of the High Court of Kerala in three sets of suits concerning chur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...