Search Results for "Mandatory deposit"

1478 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1478 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Judgment Debtor’s Liability to Pay Interest Clarified: Deposit in Appellate Court Does Not Cease Accrual of Interest" "Bombay High Court reiterates the conditions for cessation of interest under Order XXI, Rule 1 of CPC."

This case examines the cessation of interest on a decretal amount deposited by the judgment debtor in an appellate court, rather than the executing co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Order in Final Decree Proceedings for Lack of Jurisdiction — Order on I.A.Nos.15, 16 and 17 in FDP No.2/2008 Quashed for Exceeding Scope of Preliminary Decree and Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The present writ petition was filed by the petitioners (defendants in the original suit) challenging the order dated 10.06.2022 passed by the learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pre-deposit Condition in NI Act Appeal for Lack of Reasons. Section 148 NI Act Order Set Aside as Arbitrary, Directs Reconsideration Without Pre-deposit.

The petitioner, Nurallah Kamruddin Veljee, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the Trial Court and sentenced to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Pre-Deposit Order Under SARFAESI Act. Pre-deposit of 30% of Amount Due Under Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act is Mandatory and DRAT Has No Discretion to Waive It.

The petitioner, Shree Vindhya Paper Mills Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 4 November 2011, which requir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Circular Excluding Primary Cooperative Credit Societies from Deposit Insurance Coverage. Circular dated 22.02.2008 Held Valid as It Merely Clarifies Existing Definition Under Section 2(g) of DICGC Act, 1961.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by cooperative credit societies challenging a circular dated 22.02.2008 issued by the Reserve Bank of I...