Search Results for "Majority rule"

2306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition to Cancel Maintenance for Major Son in Section 125 CrPC Proceeding. Son Attained Majority and Was Earning, Thus Not Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125(3) CrPC.

The petitioner, Shivaji Baburao Bhabad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the order of the Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Due to Non-Joinder of Necessary Party. Petitioner failed to implead newly elected Vice President despite being aware of election, rendering petition not maintainable.

The petitioner, Yogendra Rangari, filed a writ petition challenging the legality and correctness of the Minutes of Meeting dated 12.02.2021, which rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Election of Deputy Chairman of Maharashtra Legislative Council. Court holds that election of Deputy Chairman is an internal matter of the House and not subject to judicial review under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Mr. Gopichand Kundalik Padalkar, a Member of the Legislative Council of Maharashtra, challenged the election of Respondent No. 4, Dr. ...