Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act"

510 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 510 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Nagpur Improvement Trust Challenging High Court Order Setting Aside Demolition Notice. Internal Road Not Shown in Development Plan Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Implemented Despite Earlier Scheme Under NIT Act.

The case involves a dispute over a 15-metre internal road proposed under a Town Planning Scheme (the 'Abhyankar Road Widening and Buty Mahal Street Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification for Pune Ring Road Project — Public Purpose and Compliance with Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shankar Dabhade and others, and Raghunath Sudam Dabhade and others, challenging a notification dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Against Encroachment on CIDCO Land by Minister's Relative. Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Glass House Construction in No Development Zone and Coastal Regulation Zone.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, a resident of Navi Mumbai and Vice President of a multinational company, filed a Public Interest Litigat...