Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Subsistence Allowance Dispute — Model Standing Orders Applicable to APMC. The court held that the definition of 'industrial or other establishments' under Section 2(ii) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, includes the act of presenting agricultural produce, making the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 applicable to the APMC.

30 Jan 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Nagpur, against the judgment of a Single Judge of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Stall Licence Under APMC Act — Violation of Natural Justice. Joint Director's Order Set Aside for Lack of Notice and Hearing Before Cancellation of Licence Under Section 52B of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Ravindra Arvind Bande, filed two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 14 Jan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Market Area Notifications Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, 1963 — Petitioners' Challenge Barred by Res Judicata and Delay. Notifications dated 24-2-1995 and 17-4-1998 declaring Jadhavwadi as principal market area upheld as petitioners failed to show any legal infirmity and were bound by earlier decisions in WP 2145/2004 and WP 7123/2005.

23 Jun 2017

The petitioners, four individuals from Aurangabad, filed a writ petition in 2006 challenging two notifications issued by the respondents: one dated 24...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Grampanchayats to Participate in APMC Elections as Nominees of Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Grampanchayat Held to Be a Local Authority Entitled to Nominate Members to APMC Under Section 11 of the Act.

29 Sep 2015

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats (village councils) in Maharashtra challenging the rejection of their nomination form...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Voting Rights for APMC Representatives in Legislative Council Elections. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Not a Local Authority Under Article 171 of the Constitution of India.

2 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Radhakishan Deorao Pathade, Chairman of the Super Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Aurangabad, filed a writ petition seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SIT Investigation into Market Committee Affairs. Government Order Appointing Special Investigating Team for Inquiry into Alleged Irregularities in Agricultural Produce Market Committee Upheld as Valid Exercise of Statutory Power.

10 Sep 2025

The petitioners, who were executive committee members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nagpur, challenged a Government order dated 18/07/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Registrar's Order Cancelling APMC Resolutions for Violating Statutory Rules. Rule 108 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Sale-Purchase (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967 Mandates Chairman, Vice Chairman, and Secretary as Signatories; Any Deviation Requires Specific Authorization.

18 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a director of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Pathri, challenged an order of the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-oper...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Whether Writ Petition Against Minister’s Order Under APMC Act Must Be Filed Before Division Bench Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Petitioners. Petitioners Challenge Amalgamation Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Under Section 43 of Maharashtra APMC Act.

4 Jan 2010

The matter arose from a dispute concerning the amalgamation of Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Motala with APMC, Malkapur. Petitioners, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

8 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Purshottam Tonpe, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Mahakal. Subsequently, he contested and won election to the Agriculture P...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)