Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals by Market Committee in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with Statutory Provisions.

25 Feb 2025

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the Special Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee for Fruits and Vegetables (the appellant) agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Market Committee Members for Non-Payment of Dues Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Rule 41(1)(i) and (k) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967 applied to disqualify members who failed to pay arrears to the Market Committee.

4 Jan 2020

The petitioners, Shankarrao Gajanan Choudhary and three others, were elected members of the Market Committee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricul...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Approval of APMC Bye-Law Amendment Allowing Private Markets in Agricultural Produce Marketing. Amendment to Bye-Law 44(1) of the Tiptur APMC enabling private market yards held valid under Section 63 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966.

19 Jul 2018

The petitioners, eleven agriculturists from Tiptur Taluk, Tumkur District, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Cotton Federation in Market Fees Dispute — State Procurement Agency Held Liable to Pay Market and Supervision Fees Under APMC Act. The Court ruled that the appellant, acting as a government agent for cotton procurement, is a 'trader' under Section 2(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and must pay fees on purchases from the market area.

11 Jan 2018

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Divisional Manager and Sub Divisional Manager of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Cotton Grow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Dropping Land Acquisition Proceedings in Collusion Case — Land Reserved for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Since 1993 Cannot Be Released Without Following Statutory Procedure Under MRTP Act, 1966.

9 Dec 2016

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Anjangaon Surji, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Land Acquisition Officer, Minor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Panchayat Samiti Member's Nomination to Market Committee Over Chairman's Claim — Rule 40A of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Cannot Override Section 13(1)(d) of the Act. The court held that the Panchayat Samiti's resolution electing a member as its representative under Section 13(1)(d) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 is valid and cannot be overridden by Rule 40A of the Rules.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajeshri Arun Munghate, a member of the Panchayat Samiti, Gadchiroli, challenged an order of the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperativ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

18 Jun 2010

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition by Agricultural Produce Market Committee Against Appointment of Junior Clerks by Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies — Appointment of Employees by Registrar Under Section 27 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Valid Despite Committee's Objections.

6 Jan 2010

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Udgir, through its Chairman, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of respondents No. 2, 3 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Article 226. Held that election disputes must be raised before the Election Tribunal under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were voters and candidates in the election of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Gangapur, filed two writ petitions under...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)