Search Results for "Madras Urban Development Project"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Division Bench Hears State Appeals Against Single Judge Order Quashing Development Charge Deduction. The Single Judge had declared that applying a blanket 33.33% deduction towards development charges in land acquisition compensation awards was impermissible without justification.

The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard three connected writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and its officials against a common order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Allotment of Excess Land Under As Is Where Is Scheme. Encroachers Cannot Claim Land Beyond What Was Allotted Based on Enumeration, as the Scheme Only Protects Livelihood of Landless Poor.

The dispute involved eight writ petitions filed by encroachers on government land classified as ‘Eri Poramboke’ in Chennai. The Government of Tami...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Revenue Authorities and Corporation to Evict Encroachers from Water Body in Contempt Proceedings. Court Finds Partial Compliance with Previous Eviction Order and Issues Further Removal Direction Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The contempt petition was instituted by S. Sunitha and Kokila seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 14.02.2024...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Tender for Construction of Commercial Complex in Thane. Court holds that no public interest is involved as the petition is filed by business rivals to scuttle a tender process.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) and three other indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.

Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000 per Hectare Based on Sale Instances and Potential for Development.

The case involves three appeals arising from a common judgment of the Reference Court dated 17/04/2012 in L.A.C. No.263/2008, concerning compensation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...