Search Results for "Lokayukta trap"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Lokayukta trap"

86 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Corruption Case, Restores FIR Against Police Officer for Demand of Bribe. High Court Erred in Quashing FIR at Pre-Evidence Stage by Holding No Demand or Acceptance Without Trial.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Karnataka through the Lokayukta Police against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court at ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order in Lokayukta Trap Case — Petitioner Deemed Suspended Under Rule 10(2)(b) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 for Custody Over 48 Hours, But Suspension Revoked After Release on Bail.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Sri. Basavaraj S/o. Pundalikappa Nirugi, aged about 59 years, was working as a Revenue Officer in the City Municipal Council, Bagalkot...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Trustworthy Evidence and Applicable Presumption. The Court Held That Minor Discrepancies in Witness Testimony Do Not Vitiate Prosecution When Core Facts of Demand and Acceptance Are Established Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) Read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Apr 2025

The present criminal appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 09.03.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Dharwad in Crimin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

25 Aug 2022

The appellant, Anil Meshram, a BSNL employee, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,500 from com...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order in Trap Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Petitioner Reinstated with Back Wages as Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Unsubstantiated Trap and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses Violated Principles of Natural Justice.

31 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Sri M.S. Kadkol, was a government employee who was dismissed from service based on a trap case. The trap was laid on a complaint dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Acquittal of Talathi and Co-accused under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

2 Mar 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 31st January 2004 passed by the Special Judge, Kolhapur, acquitting the respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused Municipal Councilor Acquitted as Complainant's Testimony Lacked Credibility and No Anthracene Marks Found on Accused's Person Under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

28 Feb 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Smt. Talimunisa Rais Ahmed, a Municipal Councilor, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Lokayukta Police in Corruption Case: High Court Erred in Quashing Proceedings at Discharge Stage Based on Premature Application of Section 65B Evidence Act. The court held that the requirement of a certificate under Section 65B arises only at the time of production of electronic evidence during trial, not at the stage of discharge, and that preliminary inquiry using spy camera is permissible.

1 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State by Karnataka Lokayukta Police against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which quashed c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act Must Be Obtained Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court held that sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and the Special Judge erred in directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Required Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court clarified that under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, sanction is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and set aside the trial court's order directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga (Crl.RP No.659/2008) and another by the a...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)