Search Results for "KIADB"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Over Land Transfer. Section 9 of Arbitration Act Does Not Confer Right to Injunction Against Third Party Transferee Without Prima Facie Case of Fraud or Collusion.

The appellants, Vasudev Garg, Chaitanya Garg, and Radhika Baig, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification Under KIAD Act Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's challenge to preliminary notification issued in 2009 dismissed as writ petition filed in 2022 is grossly delayed without explanation.

The petitioner, H.S. Abdul Riyaz Basha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Execution Court Order in Land Acquisition Reference — Directs Deposit of Enhanced Compensation as Per Original Award. Execution Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Recomputing Compensation Contrary to Final Judgment Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, claimants in a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, obtained a judgment and award dated 07....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Locus Standi in Land Acquisition Challenge Under KIAD Act. Appellant, not being a landowner or person interested, cannot challenge acquisition proceedings.

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by Sri P K George Kutty against the dismissal of his writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rejection of Reference Application in Land Acquisition Case — Petitioner Entitled to Enhanced Compensation. Civil Judge Erred in Dismissing Application Under Section 18(3)(b) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for Alleged Delay Without Considering Petitioner's Consent.

The petitioner, Smt. Mariyamma, was the owner of land bearing Sy.No.39 measuring 2 acres 39 guntas situated at Pura Village, Belagola Hobli, Srirangap...