Search Results for "Infringement Suit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Infringement Suit"

658 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 658 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

20 Jul 2016

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Trademark Suit, Holding Section 134(2) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Confers Additional Forum. Plaintiff Allowed to Sue Where It Carries on Business Even If Cause of Action Arose Elsewhere.

8 Aug 2011

The case arose out of a suit for perpetual injunction filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited (plaintiff) against Ashique Chemicals and others (defendants...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — Registered Proprietor's Rights Protected Against Deceptively Similar Marks. The court affirmed the trial court's order granting interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark 'Prem Mehandi Centre' under Sections 28, 29, 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Oct 2016

The respondent/plaintiff, proprietor of 'Prem Mehandi Centre', filed two suits (Suit No. 1 of 2015 and Suit No. 2 of 2015) against the appellants/defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction Application in 'AirTel' Trademark Dispute Between Telecom and Liquor Companies. Plaintiffs Allege Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Against Defendants Using Identical Mark on Alcoholic Beverages.

21 Mar 2006

The plaintiffs, a leading telecommunications company providing mobile services under the brand 'AirTel', filed a suit against the defendants, a liquor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Copyright Infringement Case, Upholding High Court's Restoration of Suit for Trial. The Court held that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was premature as factual issues regarding applicability of Section 15(2) of Copyright Act, 1957, required determination on merits regarding whether engineering drawings constituted a 'design' under Designs Act, 2000, and were reproduced more than fifty times by industrial process.

15 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court adjudicated appeals arising from a copyright infringement dispute between Inox India Limited (the respondent) and Cryogas Equipment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Contempt Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Alleging Violation of Interim Injunction. Defendant's Use of 'White Spicy Pepper Masala' and 'Black Spicy Pepper Masala' Examined for Being Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks Despite Interim Order Restraining Identical or Deceptively Similar Marks Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.

3 Aug 2026

The plaintiff Sky Enterprise Private Limited filed an interim application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, alleging con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement Suit Against News Channel for Unauthorized Broadcast of Cinematographic Films. The court held that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case of ownership and infringement, and the balance of convenience favored granting injunction to prevent irreparable loss.

27 Apr 2022

The plaintiff, Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, a public limited company engaged in the production, exhibition, distribution, and exploitation of cinem...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Suit — Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Injunction Held Maintainable Despite Non-Compliance with Section 52(1)(j)(ii) Notice Requirements. The Court Remanded the Suit for Fresh Consideration on Merits, Holding That the Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide the Validity of Cover Version Notices Under the Copyright Act, 1957.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, M/s. Mars Recording Private Limited, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'MAUJ' vs 'MOJ' — No Deceptive Similarity Found. Phonetic and structural comparison of marks 'MAUJ' and 'MOJ' held not deceptively similar; plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case for interim relief.

5 Jun 2023

The plaintiff, Mauj Mobile Private Limited, filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademark 'MAUJ' (registered in Classes...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)