Search Results for "Indian Evidence Act privilege"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Indian Evidence Act privilege"

151 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Mutation Dispute Based on Registered Sale Deed — U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Registered sale deed dated 04.06.1957 held valid without formal proof under Section 57 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and consolidation authorities' findings on title set aside.

1 Jan 2026

The dispute originated from a registered sale deed dated 04.06.1957, through which the predecessors of the appellants purchased agricultural land meas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Service Tax on Lottery Tickets Case — Holds That Service Tax on Promotion, Marketing, and Sale of Lottery Tickets Is Within Parliament's Competence Under Entry 97 List I Read With Article 248 of the Constitution, and Not Exclusively Within State's Domain Under Entry 62 List II. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of amendments to the Finance Act, 1994 levying service tax on services related to lotteries, reversing the Sikkim High Court's decision.

3 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals led by Union of India v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd., considered the constitutional validity of amendme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Suit Under Article 131 for Lack of Cause of Action and Suppression of Material Facts. The suit challenging the validity of notifications under the DSPE Act was held not maintainable as the dispute was not between the State and the Union but between the State and its own officers.

10 Jul 2024

The State of West Bengal filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging the validity of notificat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds OBC Reservation in All-India Quota Medical Seats — Constitutionality of Reservation for Backward Classes in State-Surrendered Seats Affirmed. Court holds that reservation in AIQ seats is permissible and does not violate the principle of merit, and that the executive can introduce reservation in AIQ seats without legislation.

20 Jan 2022

This judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Section (EWS)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Financier's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Hire-Purchase Repossession — Held That Financier Is Not a 'Service Provider' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for Repossession of Vehicle on Default. The court ruled that repossession of a vehicle under a hire-purchase agreement after default is a contractual right and not a deficiency in service.

1 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer dispute where the respondent, Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, had entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant, M/s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Impleadment of Parties in Property Dispute — Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Trial Allowed as No Prejudice Caused. Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits liberal amendment before trial; impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC allowed for complete adjudication.

1 Aug 2014

The plaintiffs, Sharayu Ramkrishna Mhatre and Anjali Deepak Karnik, filed a suit (Suit No. 1964 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaratio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

21 Dec 2010

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Denying Locus Standi to Employees in Reference Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Individual Workmen Have No Independent Right to Prosecute Reference but Industrial Court Must Exercise Discretion to Hear Them if Interests Affected.

6 Nov 2006

The petitioners, employees of Empress Mills Retail Sales Division, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th October 1995 which held that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Workmen Held Not Employees of Respondent. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the 21 persons named in the complaint were not employees of the respondent, as the respondent had ceased business and the workmen were employed by third parties.

5 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra General Kamgar Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Preventio...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)