Search Results for "Inam land"

117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

A-Kharab vs B-Kharab Land Judgment: Karnataka High Court Rules No Reclassification Without Survey & Records (2026)

The dispute concerned land in Survey No.20 of Chinnappanahalli Village, which had been granted to the petitioner’s grandfather under the Mysore ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Land Grabbing Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court holds that mere revenue inspector report without verification of title deeds cannot sustain charges under Section 420 IPC and Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioner, Sri Chennakeshava, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Ownership Dispute, Quashing Bombay High Court PIL Judgment. Revenue Minister's Recall of Ex Parte Order Upheld as Violative of Natural Justice Under Section 258 Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and Appellants' Title Established Based on 1894 Deed.

The appeals arose from a Bombay High Court judgment in a Public Interest Litigation concerning ownership of land admeasuring 5 acres and 20 gunthas in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Inam Land Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Succeeds as Plaintiffs Prove Their Father Was Granted Inam Land and They Are in Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Order for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Serve Section 4(1) Notice and Conduct Section 5-A Inquiry Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.

The petitioner, Yusuf Ali S/o Khader Shah Faqeer, is the legal heir of the original petitioner Khadarsha Faqeer. The original petitioner had filed W.P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when courts below concurrently found that suit property was joint family property and plaintiffs proved their share.

The case pertains to a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 09.01.1996 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC as the appellants failed to prove exclusive title and possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which co...