Search Results for "ITAT Justification"

73 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Gift of Property by Company to Director's Husband Held Not to be Income, as Assessee's Objections Were Not Properly Considered.

The petitioner, Bakhtawar Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., a closely held company, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2013 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 1990-91. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Without Fresh Material is Invalid and Section 45(4) Does Not Apply to Distribution of Assets on Retirement of Partner.

The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 21st July 2003 seeking to reopen the asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion on Commission Payment to Directors Held Invalid as All Issues Were Examined During Original Assessment.

The Petitioner, M/s. Dalal & Broacha Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a stock broking company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2008-09 declarin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part on Deduction Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Insurance Claim and Sundry Receipts Held Not Directly Related to Business Profits, Rental Income Treated as Business Income, Retrenchment Compensation Held Revenue Expenditure.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Withholding Tax on Firm Function Services Paid to Non-Resident US Company. Payments for Central Administrative Support Services Held Not Taxable as Fees for Included Services Under Indo-US Tax Treaty.

The petitioner, McKinsey & Company, Inc. (United States), a non-resident company incorporated under US laws, is part of the McKinsey Group providing i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Loss Deduction for Confiscated Foreign Currency in Income Tax Reference. Foreign currency confiscated by customs authorities under FERA held allowable as business loss under Income Tax Act, 1961, even though treated as undisclosed income.

The case involves an income tax reference by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the assessment year 1982-83...