Search Results for "IPC Sections 406 and 420"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "IPC Sections 406 and 420"

462 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Magistrate's Order Permitting ED to Record Statements of Accused in PMLA Case — Holding Magistrate Lacks Jurisdiction Once ECIR is Registered. Special Court (Sessions Court) Alone Can Grant Permission for Recording Statements Under PMLA Proceedings, Not the Magistrate Having Custody of the Accused.

17 Oct 2022

The petitioner, an accused in multiple criminal cases and presently in judicial custody, challenged an order passed by the I Additional Chief Metropol...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Land Dispute Case, Finds Abuse of Process and Civil Nature of Allegations Under Sections 420, 467, 468 IPC

24 Sep 2025

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against Anukul Singh for offences under Sections 420, 467, and 468 IPC, finding them to be an abuse of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Unlawful Assembly and Trespass Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Non-Compliance with Section 155 CrPC. The court held that the complaint did not specify overt acts of each accused and investigation was without proper authorization, rendering proceedings an abuse of process.

20 Nov 2020

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of proceedings...

High Court

KAHC010366622012_1

21 Jun 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 203 CrPC — No Sufficient Grounds for Process Found After Police Investigation Under Section 202 CrPC.

11 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Milind Kashinath Mahadik, filed a complaint in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class at Pune against respondent nos. 2, 3, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Successive FIRs on Same Transaction Barred. Second FIR for Offences Under Section 409 IPC Read With Section 34 IPC Quashed as It Pertained to Same Incident as Earlier FIR, Violating Prohibition Against Multiple FIRs on Same Cause of Action.

21 Mar 2017

The applicants, Lalasaheb Rajesaheb Shaikh and Tabbsumbi Ismile Shaikh, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Dispute over unpaid loan and property transfer held to be purely contractual, not constituting criminal breach of trust or cheating under Section 420 IPC.

22 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sourish Bose and Deepanvita Ghosh, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and Sec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Dispute Found to be Purely Civil in Nature. Allegations of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Under Sections 406, 420, 506 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC Quashed as Transaction Was a Civil Dispute Arising from a Loan Agreement.

10 Jul 2020

The petitioners, Mr. Nitesh Shetty and Mr. L.S. Vaidyanathan, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheets Against Cooperative Society and Chairman in CBI Bank Fraud Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 155(2) of Companies Act Renders Prosecution Invalid. The court held that prosecution for offences under the Companies Act requires prior sanction under Section 155(2), and in its absence, the charge sheets are liable to be quashed.

20 Feb 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Ghataprabha Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit (a cooperative society) and its Chairman, Lakhan Laxmanrao Jarkiholi, filed two wr...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)