Search Results for "IPC 392"

225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Doubtful Arrest and Lack of Identification. Conviction under Sections 392/397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Identity of Robbers Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Wahid and Anshu, setting aside their conviction under Sections 392/397 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery, Acquits Accused of Rape Due to Lack of Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and Section 392 IPC for robbery, but acquitted under Section 376 IPC as prosecution failed to prove rape.

The case pertains to the murder of a woman and robbery of her gold ornaments. The deceased was last seen with accused No.1 (Ajijkhan Pathan). Subseque...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife by Assault and Acid Attack — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial evidence including medical evidence, motive, and recovery of incriminating articles held sufficient to prove guilt under Section 302 IPC and Section 498-A IPC.

The appellant, Sitaram Dada Sarode, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of his wife Sangita by assaulting her with a lid of autoclave and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Soma @ Somanna, was convicted by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Devanahalli, Bangalore Rural District, in S.C. No. 136/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Gulshan Kumar Murder Case — Life Imprisonment for Murder and Attempt to Murder Confirmed. Evidence of Identification by Injured Witness and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The judgment pertains to the murder of Gulshan Kumar Dua, the founder of T-Series, who was shot dead on 12 August 1997. The appellant, Abdul Rauf Dawo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 392 IPC read with Section 120B IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act set aside as sole identification by witness was doubtful and not supported by other evidence.

The appellant, Maqbal Ahmed Gulam Mohd. Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai for offences under Section 392 read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused No.1 and Life Imprisonment for Accused No.2 in Murder and Robbery Case. The court upheld the conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC based on circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of stolen articles.

The case involves the murder of Vijayatai Vitthalrao Pund, a 75-year-old woman, who was the mother of PW1 Sunil, a practicing lawyer. The incident occ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder and Robbery Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Stolen Articles and Last Seen Evidence Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt Under Sections 302, 392, 397, 452 IPC.

The appellant, Santosh @ Santu s/o Jagasharan Pandey, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No.221 of 1999 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 397 IPC set aside as sole identifying witness failed to provide consistent description and no independent corroboration of recovery.

The appellant, Rakesh Harilal Kahar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai on November 30, 2001, in Sessions Case No.250 o...