Search Results for "Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.

The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Refusal to Condon 12-Year Delay in Restoration Application. Limitation Rules Apply Equally to Government; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The dispute originated from a lease deed executed in 1951 for a bungalow in Pune Cantonment. The respondent (landlord) filed a civil suit in 1981 for ...