Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stay on Grampanchayat Elections Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Additional Collector's Order Staying Sarpanch/Up-Sarpanch Elections Set Aside as Unauthorized Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Parmeshwar Kachru Satpute and Dadasaheb Baburao Khindkar, were members of the Group Grampanchayat of Babhalwadi, Bedkuchiwadi, and Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Disqualification for Encroachment Due to Lack of Notice. Prior notice of inspection is mandatory before disqualifying a member under Section 14(1)(J-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Rekha Dadajwar, was the Sarpanch of Dabhad Village Panchayat. She was removed from office under Section 14(1)(J-3) of the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificates — Holds That Disqualification Under Section 10(1A) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Requires Prior Opportunity of Hearing and Cannot Be Automatic.

The petitioners, three women elected as Sarpanch and Members of Gram Panchayat Kshetra Mahuli, challenged an order dated 11th February 2025 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Violation of Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Motion Held Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Smt. Kalimun Balaso Nadaf, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Udgaon. Respondent Nos. 3 to 11 submitted resignations from the post of m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Pre-Deposit Under Section 35(3-B) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Held Mandatory for Entertaining Appeal Against No-Confidence Motion.

The petitioner, Gulab Pandu Chavan, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Chidgiri, Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. A no-confidence motion was initiated against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Additional Commissioner's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Requirement Under Section 35(3B) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Directory, Not Mandatory.

The petitioners, five members of Gram Panchayat Bhosa, challenged an order of the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, which set aside the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court Holds That Removal of Sarpanch by No Confidence Motion Does Not Require Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 55(2A) of the Act.

The petitioner, Bharat Vitthal Shete, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Pimpalgaon Khand. A no confidence motion was moved against him by respondent N...