Search Results for "Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Removal of Gram Panchayat Members, Holds Reasonable Cause Must Be Considered Under Section 43-A(1)(iii) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Literal Interpretation Requiring Automatic Disqualification for Four Consecutive Absences Rejected; Opportunity of Hearing Includes Evaluation of Explanations.

22 Jan 2025

The petitioners were elected members of the Kalallughatta Gram Panchayat in Nelamanagala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District. Their membership was termina...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reservation Notification for ST Female Adhyaksha of Gram Panchayat Due to Non-Compliance with Rotation Policy. The court held that the reservation of the post of Adhyaksha of Chandanhalli Gram Panchayat for ST Female for the 2020-II (2023) term was illegal as it violated the rotation policy under the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

11 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Sri Shivanand, a member of Chandanhalli Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President for Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice issued by Assistant Commissioner without verifying signatures and without giving 15-day clear notice period held invalid.

31 May 2022

The petitioner, Smt. Sharadabai, was elected as the Adhyaksha (President) of Nagathibasapura Gram Panchayat on 04.02.2021. She challenged a notice dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Removal of Waterman for Violation of Natural Justice — Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid as Enquiry Officer Not Appointed Under Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the entire disciplinary proceedings were vitiated due to lack of jurisdiction of the enquiry officer, and directed reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages.

21 Oct 2020

The petitioner, S.K. Shankarappa, was appointed as a Waterman in Shettikere Gram Panchayath on 02.04.1998 and later assigned additional work as Bill C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of No-Confidence Motion Rules Under Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Rule 3(1), 3(2), and 3(4) of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayath) Rules, 1994 held intra vires the parent Act.

19 Dec 2019

The petitioner, B.R. Siddaramu, was the Upadhyaksha (Vice President) of Gollahalli Grama Panchayat. He was aggrieved by a notice dated 26.08.2019 issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice Issued on 15.02.2019 for Meeting on 27.02.2019 Violates the 15-Day Requirement.

22 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri S Thippeswamy, was the President of Chennammanagathihally Grama Panchayat. The respondents, including the Assistant Commissioner a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Chairman for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Period Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the 15-day notice period is mandatory and failure to comply renders the motion invalid.

12 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Smt. S. Palakshamma, was the Chairman of Marashettihalli Gram Panchayat. The respondents, including the Assistant Commissioner and sev...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against President and Vice President of Village Panchayat — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 49(2) was not complied with as the meeting was held only 4 days after the notice.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substantially Complied With.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Non-Members Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Members — Petitioners Lack Locus Standi. No-Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

19 Jan 2016

The petitioners, who are residents and social workers of Ujani village, filed writ petitions challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the m...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)