KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "Goa forest"
229 result(s) found
Found 229 result(s)
High Court
High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Solid Waste Site Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions of Land Acquisition Act. Mandatory Requirement of Section 7 and Proper Consideration of Objections Under Section 5A Not Followed; Site Selection Contrary to Municipal Solid Waste Rules.
15 Jan 2010The petitioners, landowners in Bainguinim village, Goa, challenged the acquisition of their land for the establishment of an Integrated Sanitary Landf...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Directs Forest Authorities to Dispose of Application by Deadline in Writ Petition for Non-consideration of Application. The court directed the respondents to hear and decide the petitioner's application dated 12.01.2009 on or before 15.04.2010, with the petitioner to appear before respondent no.2 on 05.04.2010.
1 Apr 2010The petitioner, Mrs. Trupti Rupesh Naik, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking a direction to the respondents, includin...
- 66
High Court
High Court Quashes Bye-Election Notification for Goa Assembly Seat Due to Insufficient Remaining Term Under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Court held that bye-election cannot be held as remainder of term for newly elected member would be less than one year from date of election result, violating mandatory prohibition in Clause (a) of proviso to Section 151-A of the Act.
8 Apr 2026The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard two writ petitions and a miscellaneous civil application challenging the Election Commission of India's Notifica...
- 762
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 90
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Stone Quarry Lease Holders Against NGT Order Prohibiting Mining in Elephant Corridor. The Court upheld the National Green Tribunal's directions to ban mining activities in the Similipal-Hadagarh-Kuldiha-Similipal elephant corridor and to complete the process for declaring a conservation reserve under Section 36 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, based on environmental and wildlife conservation concerns.
2 Mar 2022The dispute arose from an original application filed by Rural Organisation for Social Empowerment before the National Green Tribunal, seeking cancella...
- 321
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 4 and Declaration Under Section 6 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Statutory Requirements or Principles of Natural Justice.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, residents of Pernem, Goa, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for the construction of a road by the State...
- 77
High Court
- 35
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Mining Lease Renewal — Lease Deemed Expired Under Section 8A of MMDR Act, 1957. The petitioner's mining lease for iron ore in Goa expired on 22.11.2007, and the renewal application was rejected; no automatic extension under Section 8A as the lease had already expired.
8 May 2026The petitioners, Shantilal Khushaldas & Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Mukesh M. Saglani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 05.11....
- 223
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Seeking Closure of Oil Tanking Activity for Lack of Credible Evidence of Environmental Violation. Court holds that mere apprehension of harm without concrete proof of violation of environmental norms or statutory conditions does not warrant closure of a lawful industrial activity.
22 Jan 2015The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by M/s. Nitol Jinn Trust and Mr. Peter Dias against the Union of India, State of Goa...
- 150
