Search Results for "Food Analyst"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Conviction Upheld but Applicant Released on Probation Due to Health Concerns" Conviction under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act sustained; the applicant, facing deteriorating health, is granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act.

The applicant, convicted under Section 7(i) read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, sought revision of his sentence. Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Adulterated Milk in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case — Marginal Deficiency in Milk Solids Non-Fat Not Excusable. The Court held that prescribed standards under the Act must be strictly followed and even marginal deviation constitutes adulteration.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Raj Kumar, who was convicted under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated mil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Sampling of Ice Candy Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dahiwadi, acquitting Bharat Anant Shinde of offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Loss of Right to Re-test Sample. Applicant's Right Under Section 16(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 to Send Sample to Central Seed Testing Laboratory Lost as Shelf Life of Seed Expired Before Complaint Filed.

The applicant, Regional Manager of Prabhat Agri Bio-Tech Ltd., challenged criminal proceedings in S.C.C. No. 313 of 2003 pending before the Chief Judi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Division of Sample Leads to Acquittal of Vendor and Proprietor.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 30th April 2001 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solapur in Regular Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Proper Evidence. Failure to Examine Panch Witness and Prove Licence Requirement Leads to Acquittal Under Section 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Jayram Atmaram Shadija, proprietor of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Possession of Gutka for Sale Under Section 273 IPC — Gutka Not an Article of Food. Possession of Gutka for sale does not constitute an offence under Section 273 IPC as Gutka is not an article of food under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case involves two criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners, who were accused of possessing Gutka for sale, which was alleged to be an offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Denial of Right to Send Sample to Director of Central Food Laboratory Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in R.C.C. No. 338 of 1997, decided on 28.09.1999,...