Search Results for "Finance Act amendments"

576 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 576 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Notification 14/2010-ST is Clarificatory for Service Tax on Drilling Rigs in Continental Shelf. Appeal Admitted on Questions of Territorial Applicability of Service Tax to Offshore Drilling Services Under Finance Act, 1994.

The appellant, M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd., entered into contracts with ONGC in February and May 2009 to provide offshore drilling services using hire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Bifurcation of Interest and Service Charges. Tribunal's finding that no service tax liability arises prior to 01.03.2006 due to absence of mechanism for bifurcation of value of service from interest amount upheld.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order of the Cust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition; Sets Aside Order of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Rejecting Condonation of Delay Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Compensation for Land Acquisition Exempt under RFCTLARR Act Not Considered by Revenue; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision.

The petitioner, the widow of the deceased assessee, sought condonation of delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2022-23. Her h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Cable Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option Under Entertainment Tax Laws. The court upheld the amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D as valid and non-discriminatory, rejecting claims of violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A.

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable tel...