Search Results for "External 12th pass"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "External 12th pass"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Parricide Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Improper Application of Section 106 of Evidence Act. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of father set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances and accused's silence cannot fill gaps in evidence.

12 Aug 2020

The appellant, Suraj Harisingh Bahadur, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his father, Harisingh Bahadur...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers State and Complainant's Applications for Cancellation of Anticipatory Bail in Homicide Case. The Court examines whether Sessions Court erred in granting bail after charge under Section 302 IPC was added despite medical evidence indicating homicidal death.

31 Aug 2006

The dispute pertained to the death of Pooja, the wife of the accused, on 14 June 2000. Initially, the accused claimed she committed suicide due to men...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, Section 376A IPC, and Section 6 of POCSO Act, finding the crime to be in the 'rarest of rare' category.

12 Oct 2015

The case involves the confirmation of a death sentence and an appeal against conviction for the rape and murder of a two-year-old child. The incident ...

4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)