Search Results for "Electricity distribution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Electricity distribution"

639 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 639 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MSEDCL for Refund of Infrastructure Costs Under DDF Category. Consumer Definition Under Electricity Act, 2003 Includes Persons Supplied Electricity for Layout Development.

10 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Savita Chandrashekhar Thodage, applied to the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) for a new electric...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Seeking Compensation for Electrocution Injuries and Death. The Court Examines the Nature of Liability and Maintainability of Public Law Remedy Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

4 Aug 2022

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Order Restricting Electricity Bill to 24 Months in Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Head Master, Anudanit Prathamik Ashram Shala. The Court held that Regulation 6.4 of the MERC Regulations 2006 limits billing to 24 months prior to issuance, and the Forum's order was not perverse.

19 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, challenged an order dated 08.06.2016 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity Act, 2003 and MERC Regulations, 2006.

15 Mar 2022

The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Joshi, a retired Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto again...

High Court

KAHC010218752018_1

20 Sep 2021

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petitions Against Ombudsman Orders for New Electricity Connections. Court holds that refusal to provide new connections based on previous dues of a different entity is arbitrary and violative of Section 43 of Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Jan 2020

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders of the Ele...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes IPC Offences in Electricity Theft Case After Compounding Under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Dual Prosecution for Same Acts Not Permissible. The court held that once the offence under the special enactment (Electricity Act) is compounded, the IPC offences based on the same acts cannot be prosecuted, as the Electricity Act is a complete code and the compounding amounts to an election by the complainant.

9 Feb 2018

The applicant, Syed Yaqoob Syed Masood, a Taluka Agriculture Officer, filed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 0273/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Electricity Ombudsman Order Limiting Recovery of Arrears Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. Court upholds two-year limitation period for recovery of electricity charges, rejecting claim for arrears from 2003 to 2010.

24 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated December 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Writ Petition Against Electricity Company for Charging Commercial Tariff to Residential Flat Used as Office. Professional Use of Residential Premises by Advocate Does Not Convert Domestic Electricity Connection into Commercial Use Under Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Tariff Regulations.

4 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Rajendra G. Shah, an advocate practicing in Pune, used a residential flat (Flat No. 10B, Anandmayee Apartments) as his office. Initial...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee’s Appeal Against Direct Electricity Supply by Board. Board’s Action Upheld as Comparison of Maximum Demand Under Section 19(1)(b)(ii) of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 Required Assessment of Actual Supply, Not Generating Capacity.

29 Jan 1969

The appellant, Sihor Electricity Works Ltd., held a licence under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 for generation and distribution of electrical energ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)