Search Results for "Electricity Distribution Company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Electricity Distribution Company"

569 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 569 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Case — Limitation Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003 Not Applicable to Pre-2003 Dues. The Court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not apply to arrears that accrued before the Act came into force, as the Act is not retrospective.

4 Nov 2024

The case involves a dispute between the Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited (appellant), a state electricity distribution util...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Consumer in Unauthorized Use of Electricity Case — Licensee Not Liable for Tariff Violation by Sub-Licensee Without Privity of Contract.

6 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the appellate authori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Authority's Order in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Activity Held as Manufacturing, Not R&D, for Tariff Classification Under Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Jul 2024

The petitioner, a power distribution company, challenged an order of the Appellate Authority under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which hel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer in Electricity Contract Dispute Over Reduction of Load. The Court held that enhancements of contract demand constitute supplementary agreements to the initial agreement, and the three-year period under Regulation 9.2.1 of Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations, 2005 runs from the initial agreement date, not from each enhancement.

30 Apr 2021

The dispute involved a small-scale industry, the respondent, seeking reduction of its contract demand for electricity supply from 4000 KVA to 1325 KVA...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tariff Differentiation for Self-Financing Educational Institutions Under Electricity Act, 2003. The Court held that classification of Self-Financing Educational Institutions separately from Government and Aided Institutions for tariff purposes is permissible under Section 62(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, as it is based on the nature of supply and purpose.

20 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission against the Division Bench judgment of the Kerala Hi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice in Electricity Dispute — Petitioner Not Liable for Predecessor's Dues. BESCOM Cannot Recover Arrears from Auction Purchaser Without Proper Notice Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

12 Apr 2018

The petitioner, K.N. Sakrappa, proprietor of Sri Maheshwari Industries, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated 26.12.2014 issued by t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman's Order for Refund of Service Line Charges and Service Connection Charges. The court held that the Ombudsman had jurisdiction to entertain the consumer's complaint and that the charges were not recoverable upon restoration of contract demand.

7 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging ...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Quashes Electricity Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute — Demand Charges Recovery Based on Contract Demand Upheld. The court held that the Ombudsman's direction to revise bills from March 2019 and refund amounts was contrary to Clause 14.11 of the Tariff and the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code and related matters) Regulations, 2005, and that the Ombudsman lacked jurisdiction to review its own order.

27 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, challenged two orders passed by the Electric...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Electricity Distribution Company in Theft Case: Parallel Assessment Under Section 126 Permissible Despite Criminal Complaint Under Section 135. Assessment Under Section 126 Not Conditional on Consumer Seeking Restoration of Supply.

1 Aug 2019

The case involves an appeal by West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which allowed t...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)