Search Results for "Customs valuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Customs valuation"

120 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Limitation Issue - Extended Period Invoked for Differential Duty Demand Based on Transfer of Advance Licenses. The Court remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh consideration on whether the assessee's bonafide belief based on a Tribunal decision later reversed by the Supreme Court precludes invocation of extended period under Section 11A(1) proviso of Central Excise Act, 1944.

4 Jul 2023

The present appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Trib...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case Due to Incorrect Adoption of Highest Price. Valuation Must Be Based on Most Conservative Price Under Rule 6(b)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 1994, as Per Precedents on Normal Wholesale Cash Price.

1 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal filed by the revenue against an order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute Over All-in-One Desktop Computers. Goods Classified as Portable Under Tariff Item 8471 30 10 Based on Weight and Transportability, Affecting Duty Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

17 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India addressed an appeal concerning the classification of Automatic Data Processing Machines, specifically All-in-One Integrated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

10 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Excise Duty Demand on Molasses Based on Principle of Judicial Discipline. The court held that when all other show cause notices on identical facts were withdrawn, the remaining notice could not be sustained, applying the principle of judicial discipline under the Central Excise Act, 1944.

9 Apr 2014

The petitioner, M/s Shree Satpuda Tapi Parisar Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Custom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Supply of Bail Order — Failure to Provide Vital Document Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution. The detenu's right to make an effective representation was infringed when the bail order, referred to in the grounds of detention, was not supplied to him, rendering the detention order invalid under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

16 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Mohd. Shakil Khan, uncle of the detenu Nadeem Shaikh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

27 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.

10 Feb 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs) against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellat...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)