Search Results for "Customs classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Customs classification"

155 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

30 Jun 2014

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Seizure of Industrial Oil by DRI Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — DRI Has Power to Seize Goods Even After Clearance for Home Consumption. The court held that the power of seizure under Section 110 is independent of assessment and can be exercised by DRI officers as proper officers.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by importers of industrial oil challenging the seizure of their goods by the Directorate of Reve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Conditions for Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under Customs Act. Court holds that pre-deposit of differential duty and interest as condition for provisional release under Section 110A is not warranted and modifies conditions to require only bank guarantee and bond.

25 Jul 2011

The petitioners, Apollo Cranes Pvt. Ltd. and another, imported nine cranes between 17 November 2005 and 6 April 2010, which were assessed and bills of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

6 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Heinz India and GSK, Classifies Nycil Prickly Heat Powder as Medicated Talcum Powder Under Sales Tax Acts. Product Held Not to Be Medicine Despite Medicinal Properties Due to Specific Statutory Entries Including Medicated Talcum Powder Under Entry 127 of KGST Act and Toilet Powder Under Entry 1(iii) of TNGST Act.

4 May 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals concerning the classification of Nycil Prickly Heat Powder under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Mosquito Repellants, Insect Killers, Cleaners, and Antiseptic Liquid Classified Under Respective Entries at 4% VAT Rate. Products like Mortein Mosquito Coil, Mat, Liquid Vaporizer, Mortein Insect Killer, Harpic, Lizol, and Dettol Antiseptic Liquid are held to be classifiable under specific entries of Kerala VAT Act, 2003, attracting 4% tax, not higher residuary rate.

10 Apr 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which dismissed the assessee's appeal and upheld the Commissioner's classification ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Approve Dismissal in Gold Smuggling Case. Tribunal's Finding of Unfair Enquiry and Perverse Findings Upheld Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

11 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Air India Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22nd July 2004 passed ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)