Search Results for "Copyright Society"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Copyright Society"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Film Release. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Sufficient Similarity Between His Story and the Film 'Jannat 2' to Restrain Its Release.

6 Sep 2012

The appellant, Kapil Chopra, filed a suit against Kunal Deshmukh (director), Vishesh Films India Pvt. Ltd. (producer), and Fox Star Studios Private Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Press Release on GST Classification of Hand Sanitisers as Disinfectants — Executive Cannot Pre-empt Quasi-Judicial Adjudication. Press Release dated 15.07.2020 directing classification of alcohol-based hand sanitisers as 'disinfectants' under GST held ultra vires and manifestly arbitrary for encroaching upon quasi-judicial functions.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s Schulke India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in trading of hand rubs/sanitisers and antiseptics, which it claims are used as pharmaceutical...

High Court

High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.

1 Jun 2019

The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

15 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

1 Apr 2025

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Passing Off Case — 'Spring Orchid' School Restrained from Using 'Orchid' in Name. The court found that the respondent's service mark 'The Orchid School' had acquired reputation since 2004 and the appellant's adoption of 'Spring Orchid' was deceptively similar, causing likelihood of confusion among students and parents.

17 Oct 2018

The respondent, Pradnya Niketan Education Society, runs 'The Orchid School' in Baner, Pune, established in 2004 and affiliated to CBSE. It registered ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

13 Sep 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction at Source on Guarantee Money Paid to Non-Resident Cricket Boards for Matches Played in India. Income from matches held in India is deemed to accrue in India under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, attracting TDS under Section 194E.

29 Apr 2020

The case concerns an appeal by PILCOM (PAK-INDO-LANKA JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE), a committee formed by the cricket boards of Pakistan, India, and Sr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case - Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. Cherryb Pharma. The court held that the defendant's use of the mark 'REWITAL' was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered mark 'REVITAL' and amounted to infringement and passing off under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

27 Oct 2005

The plaintiff, Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant, Cherryb Pharma, under the Trade and Merchand...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)