Search Results for "Contingent Claims"

298 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 298 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Appeal Against Exclusion of Personal Guarantors from CoC in CIRP of Corporate Debtor — Re-constitution of Committee of Creditors Set Aside. Personal Guarantors Are Not Members of Committee of Creditors Under Section 21(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) heard an appeal against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Chandigarh Bench) dated 01.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Declaration and Possession. Court holds that the First Appellate Court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, rendering its judgment unsustainable.

The appellant, Sri Gundappa, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Due to Unenforceable Oral Agreement and Lack of Written Contract. Loan advanced for litigation funding held to be a contingent agreement not enforceable under Order 37 CPC as it lacked a written contract and was based on an oral understanding.

The plaintiff, Vishal Kedia, filed a commercial summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Sureshkumar S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...