Search Results for "Consolidation Scheme"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Quashes Pre-deposit Order in Customs Dispute. Merger of Sick Company with Petitioner Under SICA Extinguishes Pre-deposit Liability, and Revenue Authorities Are Bound by the BIFR Scheme.

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Remand Case — Remand Order Set Aside as Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 41 Rule 23A CPC. The appellate court cannot remand a suit for retrial when the trial court has already decided it on merits without any procedural irregularity.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 22 March 2022 passed by the District Judge, Raigad, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 22 A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Fragmentation Act Case — Preferential Right of Contiguous Land Owner Upheld. Sale of Fragmented Land to Non-Contiguous Purchaser Violates Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The appellant, Vilas Shivmurti Munde, filed a second appeal against the dismissal of his suit for declaration and injunction. The suit sought to decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC as Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence and Held Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Joint Family Property.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in a partition suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the...