Search Results for "Cenvat Credit Rules"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in MVAT Refund Case — Entitled to Refund of Unutilized CENVAT Credit Under Rule 52A of MVAT Rules. Court directs State to process refund within four weeks.

The petitioner, CEAT Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of unuti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Condonation of Delay Beyond Statutory Limit in Central Excise Appeal. Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Provides an Outer Limit of 30 Days for Condonation, Which Cannot Be Extended by Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, M/s Raj Chemicals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. The Court held that the Tribunal must consider prima facie case, balance of convenience, and financial hardship while deciding waiver of predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Hyva (India) Private Limited, is engaged in body building on motor vehicle chassis supplied by Tata Motors Limited. Tata Motors clears ...