Search Results for "Central Board"

4705 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4705 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure.

The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Challenge to Exemption of Security Guards Under Section 23 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act. Board's Discretion to Grant Exemption Upheld as No Hearing Required for Trade Unions.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshan Aghadi, a registered trade union, challenging notifications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitution of Special Bench by ITAT President on CBDT Request in Income Tax Appeal. Power under Section 255(3) of Income Tax Act is Administrative and Not Subject to Prior Hearing or Natural Justice.

The petitioner, M/s Jagati Publications Ltd., a public limited company publishing a Telugu newspaper, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Sections 74 and 75(1) of Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and Common Cadre Service Rules for Cooperative Societies. The Court held that the impugned provisions and rules are constitutionally valid and do not violate Article 19(1)(c) or Article 43B of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 74 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Orders Refusing to Enforce Settlement Under Section 634A of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal challenged the binding nature of an order recording broad settlement when consent terms were unsigned and third-party interests were involved.

The appeal arose from two orders of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 2 July 2004 and 13 September 2004, which held that an earlier CLB order dated 29...