Search Results for "Article 133"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Article 133"

908 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 908 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Applicability of Section 292 IPC to Allegedly Obscene Poem Referencing Mahatma Gandhi Amidst Claims of Poetic License and Freedom of Expression. Court Clarifies That Poetic License Is Not a Legal License but a Fundamental Right, Subject to Reasonable Restrictions Under Article 19(2), and Obscenity Must Be Judged by Contemporary Community Standards.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The case arose from the publication of a poem titled 'Gandhi Mala Bhetala' (I met Gandhi) in the July-August 1994 issue of the Bulletin, a...

Supreme Court

Civil Appeals Filed Challenging Constitutional Validity of Madhya Pradesh Act and Rules Regulating Admissions, Fee, and Reservation in Private Unaided Professional Institutions. High Court Upheld Validity of Provisions on Admissions and Fee but Supreme Court's Final Decision Awaited on Reservation and Legislative Competence.

1 Aug 2026

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, which upheld the constitutional validity of the Niji Vyavasa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

10 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

10 Dec 2019

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

21 Jun 2016

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

High Court

KAHC010059832012_1

21 Jun 2016

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petitions to Quash FIR No.311 of 2012 and Complaint C.C.No.410/SW/2012 Alleging Abuse of Process and False Implication in Matrimonial Dispute. Petitioners seek quashing under Article 226, claiming original complainant lodged false complaint in retaliation to an earlier FIR filed against her family in Punjab.

14 Oct 2013

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order dated 9th October 2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

1 Jan 1970

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)