Search Results for "Appellate Side Rules"

2499 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2499 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Murder Case Upholding Acquittal of Accused Due to Hostile Witnesses and Insufficient Evidence. Acquittal Under Sections 302/34 IPC Confirmed as Trial Court's View Was Plausible and Not Perverse, with No Reliable Eyewitness Account of Assault.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, dated 22 December 1995, acquitti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Writ Petitions Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 mandates that such petitions be heard by a Division Bench.

The Bombay High Court, in this judgment, addressed the procedural confusion regarding whether writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — Maintainability Challenge Rejected. Division Bench Holds That Writ Petition Under Article 226 Is Maintainable Despite Availability of Revision, and That a Division Bench Has Jurisdiction to Hear Such Petitions.

The petitioner, Mr. Nusli Neville Wadia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Transfer of Writ Petitions and Contempt Petition from Aurangabad Bench to Principal Seat Under Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960. Legality of Chief Justice's Administrative Transfer Orders and Validity of Proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI Raised.

The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by the Lawyers' Forum for General Utility & Litigating Public, Aurangabad, challenging the admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...