Search Results for "Adjoining Land Owner"

435 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Dispute Over Termination of Developer's Appointment for SRS Implementation in Mumbai. Unraveling the Complexities of Land Allocation and Timely Implementation in Slum Rehabilitation Schemes in Maharashtra

Legal dispute regarding the termination of a developer's appointment for implementing a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) in Mumbai under the Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000 per Hectare Based on Sale Instances and Potential for Development.

The case involves three appeals arising from a common judgment of the Reference Court dated 17/04/2012 in L.A.C. No.263/2008, concerning compensation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Metro Centre Project. Claimant's Appeal Partly Allowed; State's Appeal Dismissed.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition reference. The claimant, Arvind Bhaskar Limaye, owned land in Survey No.48/B admea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Held Not Agricultural Despite Plantation. Sale of Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels at High Price Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Section 2(14) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the assessees, husband and wife, who sold their ancestral prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Not Agricultural Land. Land adjacent to five-star hotels with high sale price and lack of systematic cultivation fails to qualify as agricultural land under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the assessees, Minguel Chandra Pais and Maria Leila Tovar Furt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold by Non-Resident Indians Held Not Agricultural Land. Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels with Barren Nature and High Sale Price Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Section 2(14) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Non-Agricultural. Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels with High Sale Price and Lack of Systematic Cultivation Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had upheld the C...