Search Results for "498-A IPC"

800 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 800 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Charges Against Husband and In-laws for Abetment of Suicide and Cruelty in 12-Year Marriage. Prima Facie Case Established Under Sections 306 and 498A IPC Based on Consistent Harassment and Sale of Streedhan.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by the husband and in-laws (appellants) against the Gujarat High Court's order refusing to discharge them from c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Complaint at Parental Home in Section 498A IPC Case — Jurisdiction Based on Continuing Offence and Consequences Under CrPC Sections 178 and 179.

The case involved a group of appeals concerning the jurisdictional issue under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) read with Sections 177, 178...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry. Conviction under Sections 304B and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry soon before her death.

The appellant, Motiram s/o Kisan Shende, was convicted by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, for offences under Sections 304B, 306, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand soon before death.

The case pertains to the death of Shaheen, who was married to Abdul Aziz (accused No. 2) on 12th April 1996. After marriage, she resided with her husb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Harassment Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304-B IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Set Aside as Demand for Money Not Proved to Be Dowry Demand.

The appeal was filed by Radhakisan Kachru Khandagale (appellant No. 1) and his father Kachru Raghunath Khandagale (appellant No. 2) challenging their ...