Search Results for "366A IPC"

Trending :

Search Results for "366A IPC"

70 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in POCSO Case — Rape and Murder of Minor Not Proven as 'Rarest of Rare' Due to Lack of Intent and Circumstantial Evidence Gaps. The court held that the case did not satisfy the 'rarest of rare' test under Section 302 IPC, as there was no premeditation or intention to kill, and the accused was a young offender.

8 Feb 2022

The case pertains to the tragic death of a minor child, Miss 'X', whose decomposed body was found on 4th April 2018 in thorny bushes used for defecati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent of Minor Victim Not Valid, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

23 Dec 2021

The appellant, Ketan Sanjay Kokate, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO, Pune for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 3 punishable under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refers Conflict on Emergency Parole for POCSO Convicts to Larger Bench. Interpretation of Rule 19(1)(C) of Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 Requires Resolution of Conflicting Decisions on Entitlement of Convicts Under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act.

6 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Pintu Uttam Sonale, a convict under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Protection of Children from S...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Kidnapping and POCSO Case — Victim Found to be Major and Willingly Accompanied Accused. No Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Sections 363, 366A IPC and Section 12 POCSO Act as Victim's Age and Consent Established.

13 Jul 2020

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Act — Testimony of Child Victim and Eye Witnesses Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. The court held that the testimony of a child victim, if credible, can be the sole basis for conviction under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

20 Dec 2019

The appellant, Baburao @ Sagar Rupaji Dhuri, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 101 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 — Sets Aside Order Declining to Treat Accused as Juvenile. Court Holds That Age Determination Must Be Based on Earliest Available Evidence and Benefit of Doubt Must Be Given to Accused.

23 Sep 2019

The appellant, Sri Puneet S, was the sole accused in a case charge-sheeted for offences under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Land Dispute Case. Circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen, extra-judicial confession, and recovery of incriminating articles held sufficient to convict under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

30 Jul 2015

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Tauba Gonde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 188/2013 for the murder of a v...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Nullity of Marriage Case Due to Coercion and Lack of Free Consent. Marriage Declared Null and Void as Appellant's Consent Was Obtained Under Threat and Coercion After Kidnapping.

20 Mar 2013

The appellant, Smt Channamma, filed a suit for declaration that her marriage with the respondent, Sri Bellappa, was a nullity on the ground that her c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unproven Age of Victim. Consensual Relationship Not Rape Under Sections 366 and 376 IPC.

6 Feb 2013

The appellant, B. Suresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Raichur, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Immoral Trafficking Case Due to Violation of Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21. The court held that the constitutional right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is violated when the State causes delays in framing charges, regardless of which agency is responsible.

9 Mar 2010

The applicant, Rajdev Kumar Mathura Yadav @ Pappu, filed a criminal application seeking bail in connection with C.R.No. RC 2/S/2008 registered by the ...

4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)