Search Results for "state award"

7021 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7021 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Enhanced Compensation Interest. Interpretation of Amended Provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Entitles Claimant to 15% Interest on Entire Award, Not Just Excess.

The State of Maharashtra acquired land belonging to the respondent-claimant under a notification published on 17 July 1980 under Section 4 of the Land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.

The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Reinstatement of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Matter — Full Back Wages Awarded for Flawed Inquiry. Syndicate Bank's Dismissal of Clerk for Alleged Misconduct Set Aside as Inquiry Was Vitiated by Bias and Non-Supply of Documents.

The petitioner, Syndicate Bank, a nationalised bank, challenged the Part-I Award dated 28.5.2003 and Part-II Award dated 7.9.2010 passed by the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Challenge to Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Prove Lapse Under Section 24(2) of LARR Act, 2013. Compensation Tendered and Possession Taken by MIDC, Acquisition Did Not Lapse.

The petitioners, Ramesh Bapurao Nikhade and Dilipkumar Bapurao Nikhade, along with the legal representatives of Bapurao Dasruji Nikhade, filed writ pe...