Search Results for "sole accused"

2569 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2569 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Common Object.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by Dnyaneshwar Thakare, Shivkumar Yadav, Virendra Kashyap, and Narendrasingh Takkal and Rambharose Malvi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eye Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as evidence lacked corroboration and credibility.

The case arises from the murder of Damu, a history sheeter and country liquor maker, on 10th August 2002 at 7:30 a.m. in village Virsi. The prosecutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's testimony was found to be unreliable and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Balu Kondiba Thengil, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Apparao under Section 302 IPC and for house trespass under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by accidental fall, not intentional poisoning.

The appellant, Rama Ghongde, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his son Ashutosh by poisoning. The prosecution case was that the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yadav Rajbahadur Ghyansingh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bheemappa, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife, Gangawwa, by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shekhappa, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of a male person whose dead body was found in a drainage on 09.01.2010. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 IPC and 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Paramesha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Hassan in Special Case No.146/2014 for offences under Sectio...