Search Results for "seventh schedule"

618 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 618 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Closure of Electro Homeopathy Clinics — Petitioners Not Qualified to Practice Medicine Under Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Electro Homeopathy Not a Recognized System of Medicine Under the Act.

The petitioners, Veerappa and Shivappa, were doctors practicing Electro Homeopathy in Karnataka. They challenged an order dated 19.09.2011 and a notic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Doctor's Petition Challenging Notice to Close Clinic and Validity of Proviso to Section 3 of Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, 2007. Challenge fails as similar petition was dismissed earlier.

The petitioner, a doctor, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 19.09.2011 issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Reinstatement Based on Post-Retirement Government Resolutions. Government Resolutions enhancing superannuation age from 58 to 60 years, issued after petitioner's retirement, cannot be applied retrospectively to reinstate a retired employee.

The petitioner, Assanchand Jain, was a Lecturer in the Electrical Engineering Department at Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI). He attain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in VAT Assessment Case — Interim Relief Restored Pending Disposal of Writ Petition. Appellant's challenge to assessment order under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 upheld on ground of violation of principles of natural justice.

The appellant, M/s. Ghodawat Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the learned Single Judge challenging an assessment order under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Obligation of State Government to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention Cases. Question of Whether Article 22(5) Mandates Separate Consideration by Government Before Referral to Advisory Board Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

The case involved writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by Abdul Karim and Others against the State of West Bengal challenging the...