Search Results for "section 376"

1813 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1813 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor Set Aside as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under POCSO Act and IPC for alleged aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a 6-year-old girl. The vic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Story. Conviction Under Section 376(g) IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape and Victim's Testimony is Full of Omissions.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Section 376(g) IPC. The appellants, Parmeshwar and Vitthal, were convicted by the trial court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 376, 323, 506, 343 IPC and Section 3(1)(xi) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Sadashiv Rahate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Khamgaon in Special Atrocity Case No.3/2011 for offences under Sections 376...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Niranjan s/o Vishnu Chavan, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, for an offence punishable under Section 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Conviction on Uncharged Act and Non-Consideration of Defence Evidence. Conviction for rape under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as trial court convicted for a different incident than charged without altering charge.

The appellant, Abdul Rajak Chapparban, was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Section 376 and 506 IPC, Section 8(2) of the Goa Child...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sri. Gangadharappa, was convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur in Special Sessions Case No.71/2018 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellants, Mangesh Vitthal Waghmare and Devidas Balchandra Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, in Atrocity Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Appa Ramrao Gavate, was convicted by the AdHoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (crimina...