Search Results for "medical contradictions"

1600 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1600 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376D IPC and SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of three accused persons under Section 376D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 3(2)(v) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Udal Harishchandra Nanak, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Eye Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Stabbing Deceased with Knife Confirmed as Testimony of Sole Eye Witness Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Sachin Dadarao Borude, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Ravi Pradhan by stabbing him wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close friend of deceased and his testimony was not corroborated by other evidence.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three appellants for the murder of Mayur Damle under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and for assaul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Credible Evidence. Dispute Over Grain Cellar Leads to Fatal Assault, but Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur dated 30 July 1997, acquitting the respondents (Gajen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC set aside as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and medical evidence did not corroborate the alleged assault.

The appellant, Sri Muniraju, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar (sitting at KGF) in Sessions Case No.147/2016 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Hanumantharayappa, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, in Sessions Case No. 81/2013 for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unexplained Delay. Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Contradicts Allegation of Forcible Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 25.04.2003 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302/149, 147, 148, 427 IPC — Trial Court Had Sentenced Appellants to Life Imprisonment. Appellants Challenged Conviction Based on Alleged Assault with Deadly Weapons Leading to Death.

This matter involved two criminal appeals and a bail application arising from the same judgment of the trial court. The appellants were original accus...