CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
Search Results for "illegal employment"
2218 result(s) found
Found 2218 result(s)
High Court
Writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenge orders of the Industrial Court, Solapur, regarding the legality of a strike and allegation of unfair labour practice. The petitions raise the issue whether compliance with Section 24 of the MRTU & PULP Act alone suffices for strike legality when the BIR Act concurrently applies.
7 Jun 2006The judgment dealt with two writ petitions filed by Vyapari Sahakari Bank Maryadit, a co-operative society, under Article 226 of the Constitution, cha...
- 37
Supreme Court
Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012
6 Feb 2026The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...
- 347
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeal in Service Dispute, Sets Aside Back-Wages Award for Exceeding Pleadings. Appellate Court Erred in Granting Back-Wages Without Claim and Without Considering Jurisdiction of Civil Court Under Section 100 CPC.
28 Jan 2026The case involves a Second Appeal filed by Amreli Nagarpalika and another against Ashwinbhai Shantilal Goradia, challenging the judgment and decree of...
- 151
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Appeal by Charitable Society Regarding Leave to Institute Suit Under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Dispute Involves Whether a Society Registered Under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 Can Be Treated as a Trust and Sought Determination of the Conditions for Granting Leave Following Allegations of Financial Mismanagement and Breach of Trust.
1 Jan 1970The dispute arose from a suit instituted under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by two plaintiffs, Dr. Shelly Batra and Mrs. Usha Gupta...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Cross Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Contract Labour Regularisation Dispute. Industrial Tribunal Found Employer-Employee Relationship and Illegal Termination but Granted Only Compensation Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
7 Aug 2025These two cross writ petitions arose from an Industrial Tribunal award dated 25.04.2019 in Reference (IT) No.41 of 2005. Sarva Shramik Sangh, a regist...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Reinstatement Ordered with Continuity of Service but Without Back Wages. Daily Wage Worker's Termination Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
24 Jan 2018The appellant, Chandrakant Prabhakar Jadhav, was a daily wage worker appointed by the State of Maharashtra (Public Works Division) on 1 July 1984. He ...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal of Daily Wager in Illegal Retrenchment Case — Reinstatement Upheld but Back Wages Reduced to 50% Due to Lack of Evidence of Unemployment. The court held that while reinstatement is the normal rule for illegal retrenchment under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, full back wages require proof of unemployment.
24 Jan 2018The appellant, Sadashiv Bhaurao Rashinkar, was a daily rated mazdoor employed by the Executive Engineer, Public Works Division, Sangamner (State Gover...
- 47
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal of Workman in KSRTC Service Dispute — Compulsory Retirement Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind. Employer Failed to Consider Alternative Employment for Disabled Conductor Under Section 47 of Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.
9 Jan 2014The appellant, D.C. Chandrashekaraiah, was employed as a Conductor under the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) at Chickmagalur Divisi...
- 219
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Seeking Quashing of Allotment of Plot No. T22 in MIDC Software Technology Park — Allegations of Arbitrary Favoritism and Violation of MIDC Disposal of Land Regulations, 1975. The petition contends that the allotment was made without following the mandatory tender process and disregarding the petitioner's prior applications, contrary to the provisions of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and the Disposal of Land Regulations, 1975.
20 Feb 2014The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the allotment of Plot No. T22, admeasuring 4950 square meters, in the Chik...
- 51
