Search Results for "blood group evidence"

1212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sadanand Kashiram Salvi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri for the murder of his wife Sangeeta under Section 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rafiq Hayachand Role, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur for the murder of Amar Laxman Mangutti under Section 302 IPC and fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Inconsistency with Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was related to deceased and her testimony was not corroborated.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Chandu. The prosecution case was that on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder in Land Dispute — Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed. Common Intention Established as Accused Armed with Axe and Sickle Chased and Assaulted Deceased, Causing Fatal Injuries.

The appellants, Prakash Bandu Patil and Bapusaheb Bandu Patil, were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Netaji under Section 302 read wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder of Wife Based on Extra-Judicial Confession and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing wife with knife after quarrel, relying on accused's phone confession to brother-in-law and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Kasam Hasan Pathan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Jamila, and sentenced to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence Found Inconsistent and Recovery Not Proved, Leading to Benefit of Doubt Under Sections 302 and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Shayamrao Ramchandra Dhayagude, was convicted by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur for offences punishable under Sections 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal and Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Procedural Lapse in Confession Recording. Victim's Mental Incapacity and Police Influence Over Accused's Confession Under Section 164 CrPC Lead to Benefit of Doubt.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dhiraj Murari Warkar from the charge under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by the Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Guilt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prashantha, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-II, Shivamogga, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a person...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC. Trial Court Conviction for Kidnapping, Rape, Murder and Destroying Evidence Under IPC and POCSO Act Upheld by High Court.

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals by special leave preferred by two appellants against the common judgment of the High Court of Uttarakhand, wh...