Search Results for "Unreasonable Delay"

1711 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1711 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.

The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 3748 OF 2011

The dispute concerns allocation of natural gas from the KG D6 fields in the Krishna-Godavari Basin, where a significant reduction in production occurr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Award in Medical Negligence Case Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court found deficiency in service due to inadequate post-operative monitoring and delayed intervention in treating a patient with aortic aneurysm, leading to death and warranting compensation.

The dispute arose from a complaint filed by the legal heirs of a deceased patient, Dinesh Jaiswal, against Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court has power to award interest for period between date of award and actual payment to prevent miscarriage of justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Labour Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Interest Act, 1978 and Article 226 of Constitution Invoked to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained Delay of Over Two Months Between In-Camera Statements and Detention Order Breaks Live Link, Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 7th July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activit...